• Alexander Funds Management

Economic Roundup

Downside risks to global economic growth prospects are mounting whilst economic indicators in the major economies are mixed and not consistently weakening. The clearest downside risk to global economic growth remains to be the escalating trade war between the United States and China. Other prominent downside risks include potential political and economic turmoil in Europe, with the approaching Italian election and the likelihood of Britain crashing out of the EU without a deal at the end of October. The democracy protests in Hong Kong are also a flashpoint for potential, sudden political turmoil if China intervenes with force. Set against these downside risks to global growth, the world’s central banks are ready to ease monetary conditions and the chances of a significant rise in government spending in one or more of the bigger economies are increasing.


In the US, Q2 GDP growth being at 2.1% annualised was better than expected and the reports of economic activity early in Q3 are pointing to strong growth again in Q3. Strong household spending growth (4.3% annualised) has provided the biggest support for US GDP in Q2 and looks to provide similar or even better, support to Q3 GDP on the basis of near record high consumer confidence. Retail sales grew strong in July, up 0.7% m-o-m. Low unemployment, plentiful jobs including for low-skilled workers, strong wages growth including for the lower paid are all providing very strong support for household spending that is unlikely to diminish in the near-term.


The downside risks to US economic growth comes from more hesitant business spending due to the disruption in cost and supply lines caused by higher tariffs on imports from China. Most recently President Trump’s has called for US companies to simply not trade with China. Weaker US business investment spending could erode US growth prospects over time, potentially leading to recession although probably not until late 2020 or 2021. Also, the risk of a US recession could diminish further if the Federal Reserve (Fed) eases monetary policy more aggressively and/ or government spending in the US rises more rapidly.


The Fed cut funds rate 25bps to a 2.00 to 2.25% range at its end-July policy meeting, but the cut was not as big as called for by many in the market and certainly not the large rate cut called for by President Trump to weaponise monetary policy in his escalating trade war with China. The Fed is caught between maintaining policy independence and changing monetary conditions to reflect the needs of the US economy according to its own economic forecasts or bowing to political pressure in setting rates.


The modest late-July cut in funds rate speaks of a Fed resisting political pressure. The funds rate may still be cut further, but only modestly as long as US economic growth holds up. Despite President Trump’s attempts to lay the blame at the feet of the Fed for any potential weakness in US growth, it is becoming more widely understood that the escalating trade war is the main cause of uncertainty about future US economic growth prospects. The blame is likely to be directly towards President Trump for increasing US economic uncertainty and as it does, the President is likely to need to start deescalating as the 2020 Presidential election year draws closer.


In China, Q2 GDP growth slowed to 6.2% y-o-y from 6.4% in Q1 and the signs are that China’s economic growth rate is slowing further in Q3. In July, growth in industrial productions eased to 4.8% y-o-y from 6.3% in June. The part of China’s economy that the authorities would like to see gain traction being retail sales, is losing momentum growing 7.6% y-o-y in July, down from 9.8% in June. International trade growth is soft. The trade war with the US is hurting. The democracy protests in Hong Kong are also tipping its economy towards recession. If China intervenes in Hong Kong, it risks fomenting far greater political and economic uncertainty. If it continues to sit on the sidelines, the escalating protests in Hong Kong threaten a deep recession in the territory extending into bordering parts of southern China. So far, the authorities in China have been cautiously deploying more expansionary fiscal and monetary policy to try and offset the negative impact of the trade war and the disturbance in Hong Kong. At some point it is likely that more aggressive stimulus measures will be adopted. Until that occurs, China’s growth prospects are sliding.


In Europe, while a prospective hard British Brexit in late October and the likelihood that the approaching Italian elections will result in an unstable anti-EU, Governments are threatening to further weaken European economic growth prospects, recent economic indicators have mostly been a touch better than expected. Annual GDP growth moderated less than expected in Q2 to 1.1% y-o-y. The preliminary August manufacturing PMI was better than expected, lifting to 47.0 from 46.5 in July although still sitting below the 50 expansion/contraction line. The August preliminary services sector PMI, against expectations of deterioration, improved to 53.4 from 53.2 in July. Europe’s unemployment fell to a decade low 7.5% in July. Understandably, the European Central Bank remains focused on downside risks to Europe’s soft economic outlook and is actively examining other unconventional measures of monetary easing it may be able to deploy if needed.

In Australia, signs of moderate-paced economic growth generating good growth in employment without reduction in the unemployment rate and no upward pressure on inflation continued in August. Q2 GDP is due to be released next week and although quarter-on-quarter growth seems likely to be the best in a year, (around 0.6% q-o-q) annual GDP growth is still likely to slide to around 1.5% y-o-y. Strong contribution to GDP growth from net exports and government spending, plus a weak contribution from household consumption spending are exceeding weakness in private capital expenditure preventing the economy from sliding into recession. Whilst the risk of recession is low, especially with evidence that home sales and prices turned the corner several months ago and are rising, the prospects for GDP growth are modest at best.

Modest Australian GDP growth is likely to continue to generate employment growth but the supply of labour is likely to continue to rise just about as fast. Wages growth is lifting (+0.6% q-o-q in Q2, +2.3% y-o-y) but very slowly. A key question is whether reasonable employment growth combined with the slow improvement in wages will be sufficient to encourage household spending to grow at a better pace. In the near-term, tax cuts and lower home mortgage interest rates may boost household spending growth briefly, and help generate stronger GDP growth in Q3 and Q4.


Australia’s economic growth outlook is quite promising near-term but in 2020 is precariously balanced. The two 25bps cash rate cuts by the RBA in June and July to 1.00% were aimed to provide more support for economic growth. The RBA will most likely wait and judge the impact of those rate cuts and the tax cuts. The RBA is watching the unemployment rate and wages growth especially closely. Neither the Q2 wages report (steady annual wages growth at 2.3% y-o-y) or the July labour force report (employment up 41,400 with unemployment rate steady at 5.2%) point to a pressing need for the RBA to cut the cash rate again in the near-term. At this stage, the cash rate looks set for a reasonably lengthy stay at 1.00%.

Recent Posts

See All

Economic Roundup

Economic reports released in June in the US, Europe and much of Asia show economic activity lifting sharply in response to government stimulus measures and further easing of COVID-19 lockdown measures

So Far So Good

There is no way Australia will avoid a very sharp fall in GDP in Q2 because of covid-19 shutdowns and restrictions. But there are increasing signs that the worst of the economic damage will be confine

Market Drivers

Risk assets rose sharply in April, recovering some of the big losses incurred in February and March. While the deeply negative economic impact of COVID-19 restrictions started to show in data releases